Table. 4.

Association between radiographic lumbar spondylosis and the 4 body composition categories

SexGroupCrudeModel 1Model 2



Unweighted frequency (Weighted %)OR (95% CI)PUnweighted frequency (Weighted %)OR (95% CI)PUnweighted frequency (Weighted %)OR (95% CI)P
MaleNO201 (30.2)Reference201 (30.2)Reference199 (30.3)Reference
SP363 (35.8)0.88 (0.57-1.34)0.54363 (35.8)0.79 (0.52-1.20)0.266359 (35.8)0.79 (0.50-1.24)0.306
OB28 (6.8)1.50 (0.63-3.59)0.36428 (6.8)1.69 (0.69-4.14)0.25328 (6.9)1.66 (0.61-4.47)0.319
SO178 (27.1)0.89 (0.58-1.38)0.607178 (27.1)0.91 (0.59-1.38)0.641178 (27.0)0.89 (0.50-1.57)0.681
Total770770764
FemaleNO286 (30.2)Reference286 (30.2)Reference283 (30.2)Reference
SP338 (33.1)1.05 (0.71-1.54)0.813338 (33.1)1.14 (0.78-1.68)0.493335 (33.1)0.99 (0.67-1.47)0.955
OB32 (3.0)1.75 (0.65-4.69)0.26632 (3.0)2.23 (0.82-6.07)0.11732 (3.1)1.56 (0.54-4.50)0.407
SO343 (33.7)0.91 (0.62-1.35)0.643343 (33.7)1.09 (0.71-1.66)0.692342 (33.7)0.72 (0.41-1.24)0.235
Total999999992

Crude and each odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) calculated by using the complex-sample logistic regression analysis.

Model 1 was adjusted for age.

Model 2 was adjusted for age and waist circumference.

NO, normal body composition; SP, sarcopenic non-obesity; OB, non-sarcopenic obesity; SO, sarcopenic obesity.

J Obes Metab Syndr 2017;26:36~44 https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes.2017.26.1.36
© JOMES