J Obes Metab Syndr 2021; 30(3): 248-260
Published online September 30, 2021 https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes21046
Copyright © Korean Society for the Study of Obesity.
1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam; 2Department of Internal Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 82 Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, preventive measures mandated by government policies have included the closure of exercise facilities and movement restriction, which can lead to an unhealthy lifestyle. We investigated the effect of these preventive measures on metabolic parameters in individuals with cardiometabolic disorders.
Methods: In this retrospective, observational study of patients who visited the hospital at least twice a year for the past 4 years, changes in cardiometabolic factors during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019–2020) were compared with changes in the same cohort at the same annual time points during the previous seasons of 2016–2019.
Results: A total of 1,485 individuals with a mean age of 61.8±11.7 years were included in the analyses. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients whose metabolic syndrome worsened increased significantly by 21% compared with the 2018–2019 season. Body mass index increased by 0.09±1.16 kg/m2 in the 2019–2020 pandemic period, whereas it decreased by –0.39±3.03 kg/m2 in 2018–2019 and by –0.34±2.18 kg/m2 in 2017–2018 (both P<0.05). Systolic blood pressure increased by 2.6±18.2 mmHg in the COVID-19 pandemic period, while it decreased in the three antecedent seasons (all P<0.05). Lipid profiles worsened in the pandemic period compared with the previous years. Framingham coronary heart disease risk score also increased significantly.
Conclusion: Nationwide strategies to maintain cardiometabolic health are necessary during contagious disease pandemics like COVID-19 to mitigate the adverse health effects of pandemic-preventative strategies.
Keywords: COVID-19, Metabolic syndrome, Obesity, Dyslipidemia, Coronary heart disease
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As of February 23, 2021, 111,365,509 cases and 2,466,239 deaths have been confirmed.1 SARS-CoV-2 induces mild symptoms in the initial stage but has the potential to result in severe illness, including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiorgan involvement, and shock.2
In South Korea, the COVID-19 pandemic broke out in February 2020 (Fig. 1A), and in response the government raised the crisis alert level to “severe,” the highest (Fig. 1B). Infectious disease prevention and control measures included shutting down public facilities such as libraries and sports centers, and suspending school attendance. The public was requested to refrain from going outside unnecessarily, except for commuting to/from work, and to maintain at least 1–2-m distance from others in the workplace.3 As a result, personal movements decreased by 38.1% during the early period of the COVID-19 outbreak compared with before the outbreak based on mobile big data.4 Thanks to these preventive measures and cooperation from the general public, the number of daily new domestic infections in South Korea fell dramatically.
In the early days following the introduction of these measures, people were cautious and made lifestyle changes, but became less cautious over time. The infection rate dropped from 441 to 47 per day as of October 15, 2020—although it has risen to 621 per day as of February 17, 2021.5 The Korean government has again raised the crisis alert level, which means stricter observation of social distancing, and a ban on staying in public places and in indoor health facilities, cafes, bars, and any places where people gather together. Large-scale gatherings are also prohibited (see http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/en/).
Several groups, including ours, have reported that old age, diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and obesity are risk factors for fatal outcomes of COVID- 19.6 People with coronary heart disease (CHD) or DM have a higher chance of being admitted to intensive care units, needing mechanical ventilation, or of dying due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.7 Because elevated glucose levels directly promote SARS-CoV-2 replication, which essentially requires glycolysis in the host,8 patients with uncontrolled DM are expected to experience more rapid progression of COVID-19.6 Moreover, metabolic syndrome induces host immune dysregulation and a proinflammatory milieu, leading to increased severity and mortality when infected with SARSCoV- 2 via vasculopathy, thrombosis, and coagulopathy.9
Conversely, inactivity associated with social and physical distancing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 might impair metabolic control.10 Thus, preventive measures initiated as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as preventing people from going outdoors and shutting down exercise facilities, are likely to have a negative influence on public lifestyle and behaviors,11 which could adversely affect cardiometabolic health.12 So far, the impacts of COVID- 19 prevention and related control measures on chronic diseases have not been evaluated. Here, we hypothesized that the COVID- 19 pandemic and associated unhealthy lifestyles would negatively influence metabolic parameters in individuals with cardiometabolic risk factors.
This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study conducted at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH) in South Korea. The study was approved by our independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (SNUBH: B-2008/630-102). The study population was adults aged over 19 years with diagnosed cardiometabolic risk factors including impaired glucose metabolism, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or obesity who visited the outpatient clinic of the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at SNUBH. Patients who visited from September 1, 2016, to May 31, 2020, at least twice a year, before and after February, the time of South Korea’s COVID-19 outbreak, were further selected. In all, 7,094 patients with International Classification of Diseases Tenth Edition (ICD-10) diagnostic codes of E10–14 for DM, I10 and I15 for hypertension, E78 for dyslipidemia, and/or E66 for obesity were identified using the hospital database and a clinical data warehouse (CDW).13
Patients who were hospitalized for a major illness or major surgery, and who received dialysis during the study period were excluded (Supplementary Fig. 1). Major surgery was defined as surgery performed for neoplasms, diseases of blood-forming organs, circulatory, or digestive systems, or injuries determined by ICD-10 codes starting with C, D, I, K, or S. The number of patients hospitalized in the endocrinology unit did not differ between years, but these patients were excluded from the study analysis because hospitalization for intensive glucose-lowering therapy might have hindered identifying the impact of pandemic preventive measures. The number of patients who visited the outpatient clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic was similar to the number who visited the clinic during the same time frame in previous years. Thus, loss to follow-up during the study period is not a limitation of the current study.
The Korean government reinforced the national public health emergency response by emphasizing the need to maintain social distancing on February 29, 2020. Therefore, we divided clinical data according to date of examination as follows: (1) from September 2019 to November 2019 (“fall”); (2) from December 2019 to February 2020 (“winter”), and (3) from March 2020 to May (“spring”), and compared clinical parameters in each season with those of the previous years (2016–2017, 2017–2018, and 2018– 2019) (Fig. 1C).
Patients’ outpatient care information, admission information, clinical laboratory values, anthropometric measurements, and prescription information were retrieved from the CDW. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively), and metabolic profiles such as levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in each season were summarized as means for each individual prior to analysis. Data cleaning was performed for manually inputted anthropometrics into the system at the time of care. Values that were obviously inaccurate, provided in ranges, or physically impossible and considered to be typographic errors were discarded, such as height >300 cm, body weight <10 kg, and DBP >SBP. For clinical values with a high standard deviation (SD) in individuals, such as SBP SD >50 or weight SD >10, consecutive measurements were checked further to determine whether this was an error or a change in clinical status. Height was converted to a 4-year mean measure for each patient considering measurement variation. Then, BMI was recalculated as mass (in kilograms) divided by height (in meters) squared. The use of medications for DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was also investigated.
Anthropometric and biochemical parameters were measured in SNUBH as reported previously.14 Height and body weight were measured using standard methods with the subjects in light clothing. FPG concentration was measured using the glucose oxidase method (747 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). HbA1c levels were measured using a Bio-Rad Variant II Turbo High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Analyzer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in a National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program level II certified laboratory. Total cholesterol, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels were measured using a 747 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer (Hitachi).
Metabolic syndrome was defined using modified Adult Treatment Panel III criteria.15 Because waist circumference data were limited, the World Health Organization Asia-Pacific criteria for BMI were used;16 metabolic syndrome was diagnosed as the existence of at least three of the following abnormal findings: (1) FPG ≥100 mg/dL and/or taking antidiabetic agents; (2) SBP ≥130 mmHg, DBP ≥85 mmHg, and/or taking antihypertensive agents; (3) TG ≥150 mg/dL and/or taking lipid-lowering agents; (4) HDL-C ≤40 mg/dL in men and HDL-C ≤50 mg/dL in women, and (5) BMI ≥23 kg/m2 and/or taking anti-obesity agents. Patients with HbA1c ≥6.5% and/or taking antidiabetic agents were classified according to the status of DM treatment.
Ten-year CHD risk was calculated using the Framingham risk score (FRS).17 The correlation of calculated CHD risk with actual 10-year CHD was shown to be stronger when using total cholesterol levels than when using LDL-C scoring in Korean subjects.18 Therefore, FRS in this study was calculated using TC level.
All data were obtained for the same subjects in all four periods/ seasons. Continuous variables are summarized as mean±SD and categorical variables are shown as numbers and percentages of subjects. Normality of data distributions were evaluated using the Shapiro- Wilk test and by histograms; all variables were found to be normally distributed with bell-shaped symmetric graphs. Student ttest was used to assess the significance of differences in continuous variables between groups while the chi-square test was used to assess the significance of differences in categorical variables between groups. Changes in values from winter 2019 to spring 2020 for the 2019–2020 season and those from the same time frame from 2016 to 2019 for the 2016–2017, 2017–2018, and 2018–2019 seasons were obtained. Values in the 2019–2020 season were compared with those of each previous season using paired Student t-tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction. Because the patient follow-up period was up to 6 months, not all the patients had complete seasonal data. To reduce bias, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations for those patients who did not have complete test results.19 Imputed data were used to analyze changes in values. Relative risk (RR) was calculated as the number of patients who showed worse metabolic syndrome components in the 2019–2020 season than in the 2018–2019 season, and expressed as RR with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup comparisons of risk estimates by age and sex were made with tests of interactions.20 Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided
A total of 1,485 patients with a mean age of 61.8±11.7 years in September 2016 were included in this study. The proportions of men and women were almost equal (male: n=757, 51.0%). All patients had at least one chronic cardiometabolic impairment such as DM, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or obesity at baseline (Table 1). The number of comorbid diseases tended to increase with time. Total use of antidiabetic agents increased in 2019 compared with 2016. Total use of anti-obesity agents increased in 2019–2020 compared with the previous 3 years. Usage of recently approved antidiabetic drugs in Korea, namely sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), increased in 2019–2020 (Table 1).
Raw values of cardiometabolic risk components before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and preventive measures are shown in Fig. 2. The degree of increase in body weight, BMI, SBP, and DBP values was highest in the spring of 2020 compared with the springs of other years. The increase in HbA1c levels was most prominent in the most recent seasons, ranging from 7.27%±1.24% in the winter of 2019 to 7.33%±1.25% in the spring of 2020 (2019– 2020 season) compared with the other seasons. Differences in levels of other factors—FPG, TG, and HDL-C—were similar across all four years. Differences in cardiometabolic risk factors are shown in Table 2. SBP and total cholesterol measures increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with the prior 3 years. Increases in body weight and BMI were statistically significant in the 2019–2020 season when compared with those in the 2017–2018 and 2018–2019 seasons.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of patients who developed metabolic syndrome increased: 375 (25.3%) in 2019– 2020 vs. 309 (20.8%) in 2018–2019 (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06–1.39) (Fig. 3A). Blood pressure and HbA1c levels increased significantly in the 2019–2020 COVID-19 season compared with the previous 2018–2019 season. During the COVID-19 pandemic period, subjects under 65 years developed metabolic syndrome more frequently than in previous years (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02–1.52), though this was not true for those 65 years and older (
Changes in 10-year CHD risk by FRS are shown in Fig. 4. Tenyear CHD risk increased in the 2019–2020 season, but not in the other three seasons: it was 1.0%±6.2% in 2019–2020 vs. –0.7%± 6.0% in 2018–2019, –0.2%±5.3% in 2017–2018, and –0.2%±5.4% in 2016–2017,
Here, we found that cardiometabolic risk factors deteriorated significantly in subjects with metabolic impairment in South Korea during the COVID-19 pandemic when preventive measures were mandated by the government. In the 2019–2020 season, the proportion of subjects with metabolic syndrome increased significantly by 21% compared with the 2018–2019 season. Ten-year CHD risk also increased compared with the previous three years. Additionally, not only body weight and BMI, but also blood pressures, lipid profiles, and HbA1c changed in an unfavorable direction during the COVID-19 pandemic.
COVID-19 preventive measures implemented in South Korea included social distancing of 1–2 m, telecommuting, remote classes, and closure of exercise facilities, such as community health centers, private fitness centers, swimming pools, and parks (described in Korean at http://ncov.mohw.go.kr/en/guidelineList.do?brdId=18&brdGubun=181&dataGubun=&ncvContSeq=&contSeq=&board_id=&gubun=). We reasoned that these measures could aggravate cardiometabolic risk factors in patients who have underlying metabolic dysregulation. According to mobile big data,4 because of the social distancing policy, personal movement of the general public in South Korea decreased by 38.1% in the 4th week of the COVID-19 outbreak (February 24–March 1, 2020) compared with the period before a confirmed COVID-19 case was identified (January 9–22, 2020). Like many countries, trips to all major destinations except personal residences in South Korea dropped significantly by 50 to 80% in early March 2020 when COVID-19 was declared a pandemic (https://kojects.com/2020/06/01/mobilitykorea-covid-19/). A recent self-report survey showed that people spent more time at home and actually gained weight during the COVID-19 pandemic.21 Acute reductions in physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic might worsen insulin resistance and result in body weight gain.22
In addition, various public health interventions including staying at home, refraining from nonessential social activities, and school closures limit access to healthy food options.10 Based on data derived from leading food delivery apps in Korea (Baemin [https://www.baemin.com] and Yogiyo [https://www.yogiyo.co.kr]), the number of food deliveries increased by 11% during February 1–16 compared with January 6–21 after the virus had spread across the country (https://pulsenews.co.kr/view.php?sc=30800022&year=2020&no=176494). Popular delivered foods were fast foods such as pizza, fried chicken, French fries, and sugar-containing drinks.23 These foods are more obesogenic than homemade foods.24 More specifically, Korean-style fast foods are popular in South Korea because they are less expensive and easier to order regardless of household income level and residential location.25 Of particular concern, Korean-style fast foods contain high-carbohydrate ingredients such as white flour, white rice, and cornstarch. Increased consumption of these foods is associated with increased energy density and high glycemic load.26 Some previous studies have shown that increased consumption of fast food and sugar-containing drinks is associated with an increased risk of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and DM.26,27
From a sociological context, the COVID-19 pandemic has produced economic disruption and many households are suffering financial distress, limiting their access to healthy foods. In addition, a decrease in outdoor activities and an increase in time spent using the Internet and social network services, playing online games, and watching TV may have also had a negative impact on diet.28 Thus, measures instituted to protect against the spread of COVID-19 may have contributed to a sedentary lifestyle and unhealthy nutrition among the general public.
We found that the 10-year CHD risk of patients increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea. Patients aged ≥65 years displayed an increasing trend in their 10-year CHD risk score (1.2%± 7.1%,
In the current analysis, body weight, blood pressure, and lipid levels decreased in spring except during the 2019–2020 COVID-19 pandemic season. This is a similar finding to those reported in previous studies.29-31 Body weight was lowest during the winter of 2019, most likely due to increased usage of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RAs, and anti-obesity agents, specifically liraglutide. In addition, cardiometabolic risk parameters within our cohort increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic and institution of COVID-19 preventive measures. These findings suggest that these preventative measures have an unfavorable impact on cardiometabolic risk parameters. As SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs reduce the incidence of cardiovascular disease, identifying the actual occurrence of cardiovascular disease with follow-up observation is necessary.
Other mechanisms have been suggested to explain the association between COVID-19 pandemic and the aggravation of metabolic profiles and increased cardiovascular risk. It is clear that the COVID-19 pandemic is having a negative influence on mental health.32 Many people are psychologically distressed due to fear of infection or dying, which might lead to systemic inflammation.33 Limited access to exercise facilities and disruption of human relationships also increase psychological stress levels, which likely contributes to elevations in blood pressure and dysregulation of glucose homeostasis as a result of the release of stress hormones such as cortisol and catecholamines by activation of the hypothalamic– pituitary–adrenal axis.34 In fact, the sympathetic system produces increased levels of catecholamines after catastrophic events, which influence the heart and blood vessels negatively.35 In a dysregulated metabolic status, the renin–angiotensin system is inappropriately activated, which also leads to increased production of angiotensinogen (up to 30% of circulating angiotensinogen) and elevated plasma renin activity, which in turn contributes to an increase in blood pressure and impaired glucose metabolism.36 Although the effects of this pandemic may not be evident in the short term, its long-term impacts on cardiometabolic risk cannot be ignored.12
In the current study, males had a significantly increased risk of metabolic syndrome and low HDL-C during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with previous seasons. In general, middle-aged men are more involved in economic activities than women or elderly populations in Korea,37 and may therefore have been more affected by current preventive measure than females, which could explain the above findings.
Considering the deterioration in cardiometabolic profiles during the COVID-19 pandemic, physicians should focus on patients with metabolic impairment to prevent future adverse cardiovascular events. Elevated release of cytokines in metabolic syndrome status is likely to provoke a “cytokine storm” in those individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2, which may lead to multiorgan failure.38 Governments and medical institutions must promote physical activity, healthy eating, and mental health care during such pandemics. Social media or web-based programs can help patients maintain healthy lifestyles. Active counseling to help people with metabolic dysregulation cope with barriers to healthier lifestyles would be helpful in this critical situation.39
One strength of this study is that we focused exclusively on regularly attending outpatients who were followed-up for 4 years to reduce bias. Nonetheless, the study population was from a single center and only individuals who visited at least twice a year during 2016–2020 were included. Thus, the results reported might not be representative of the broader population in Korea. We did not investigate changes in physical activity or dietary habits in the study subjects. Moreover, it was not possible to observe the actual occurrence of CHD given the short observation period. Instead, we used 10-year CHD risk based on the FRS, but this is a well-established tool that has been used widely for this purpose.17
In conclusion, we found that the COVID-19 pandemic and its preventive measures had a negative influence on cardiometabolic profiles in subjects with metabolic impairments. This might be because of decreased physical activity and unhealthy dietary patterns linked to preventive measures such as social distancing and lockdown. Movement of individuals decreased in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, thus we expect that a similar aggravation in cardiometabolic risks will be found in other countries affected by the pandemic. From a long-term perspective, encouraging home exercise and healthy homemade meals is strongly recommended to mitigate the unfavorable impact of COVID-19 and related government preventive policies on cardiometabolic risk.
Bo Kyung Koo is an Associate Editor and Soo Lim is a Senior Editor of the journal. However, they were not involved in the peer reviewer selection, evaluation, or decision process of this article. Otherwise, no other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
This research was funded by Yuhan Corporation through a subcontract with Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. The funding agency had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
This research was funded by Yuhan Corporation (Seoul, South Korea) through a subcontract with Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Seongnam, South Korea) (06-2020-334).
Study concept and design: MS, BKK, and SL; acquisition of data: MS and SL; analysis and interpretation of data: MS and SL; drafting of the manuscript: MS and SL; critical revision of the manuscript: all authors; obtained funding: SL; administrative, technical, or material support: MS; and study supervision: SL.
|Variable||Winter 2016||Winter 2017||Winter 2018||Winter 2019|
|Weight (kg)||67.1 ± 12.7||67.9 ± 12.4||67.5 ± 12.3||66.2 ± 12.0†,‡|
|BMI (kg/m2)||25.2 ± 3.3||25.5 ± 3.3||25.4 ± 3.4||24.9 ± 3.2*,†,‡|
|SBP (mmHg)||133.0 ± 14.9||135.2 ± 14.8*||136.7 ± 15.0*,†||136.8 ± 16.0*,†|
|DBP (mmHg)||77.6 ± 10.5||78.5 ± 10.1||77.6 ± 11.2||77 ± 11.7†|
|FPG (mg/dL)||141.3 ± 41.5||147 ± 43.8*||145.6 ± 44.5*||143.1 ± 39.9†|
|HbA1c (%)||7.22 ± 1.3||7.28 ± 1.19||7.34 ± 1.23*||7.27 ± 1.24|
|TC (mg/dL)||165.9 ± 37.0||165.7 ± 38.8||162.6 ± 37.1*||162.9 ± 39.7|
|TG (mg/dL)||148.1 ± 83.5||147.6 ± 96.1||139 ± 79.3*||137.8 ± 91.9|
|HDL-C (mg/dL)||50.5 ± 10.9||51.1 ± 11.4||49.6 ± 11.7*||52.2 ± 12.8*,†,‡|
|LDL-C (mg/dL)||91.5 ± 26.8||90.9 ± 28.3||96.8 ± 26.8*,†||97.4 ± 28.3*,†|
|Diabetes mellitus||1,348 (90.8)||1,348 (90.8)||1,348 (90.8)||1,350 (90.9)|
|Hypertension||814 (54.8)||834 (56.2)||840 (56.6)||849 (57.2)|
|Dyslipidemia||1,162 (78.2)||1,158 (78.0)||1,163 (78.3)||1,169 (78.7)|
|Obesity||740 (49.8)||778 (52.4)||753 (50.7)||689 (46.4)|
|Antidiabetic agent||1,159 (78.0)||1,181 (79.5)||1,207 (81.3)*||1,212 (81.6)*|
|Insulin||190 (12.8)||192 (12.9)||188 (12.7)||218 (14.7)|
|Metformin||1,087 (73.2)||1,100 (74.1)||1,123 (75.6)||1,113 (74.9)|
|DPP4 inhibitor||590 (39.7)||570 (38.4)||561 (37.8)||557 (37.5)|
|SGLT-2 inhibitor||79 (5.3)||102 (6.9)||174 (11.7)*,†||209 (14.1)*,†|
|Sulfonylurea||485 (32.7)||511 (34.4)||519 (34.9)||520 (35.0)|
|Thiazolidinedione||92 (6.2)||84 (5.7)||73 (4.9)||68 (4.6)|
|α-Glucosidase inhibitor||6 (0.4)||5 (0.3)||5 (0.3)||4 (0.3)|
|GLP-1 RA||4 (0.3)||6 (0.4)||14 (0.9)||14 (0.9)*|
|Antihypertensive agent||726 (48.9)||753 (50.7)||763 (51.4)||767 (51.6)|
|ACE inhibitor||65 (4.4)||64 (4.3)||64 (4.3)||58 (3.9)|
|ARB||554 (37.3)||556 (37.4)||570 (38.4)||580 (39.1)|
|CCB||398 (26.8)||421 (28.4)||429 (28.9)||431 (29.0)|
|Diuretic||92 (6.2)||101 (6.8)||103 (6.9)||109 (7.3)|
|β-blocker||90 (6.1)||108 (7.3)||108 (7.3)||96 (6.5)|
|Lipid-lowering agent||887 (59.7)||888 (59.8)||891 (60.0)||907 (61.1)|
|Statin||878 (59.1)||877 (59.1)||880 (59.3)||893 (60.1)|
|Ezetimibe||160 (10.8)||171 (11.5)||186 (12.5)||182 (12.3)|
|PCSK9 inhibitor||0||0||0||1 (0.1)|
|Fibrate||36 (2.4)||57 (3.8)||28 (1.9)†||33 (2.2)†|
|Cholestyramine resin||1 (0.1)||0||1 (0.1)||1 (0.1)|
|Nicotinic acid||1 (0.1)||0||0||0|
|Omega 3 fatty acid||15 (1.0)||12 (0.8)||15 (1.0)||21 (1.4)|
|Anti-obesity agent||1 (0.1)||2 (0.1)||7 (0.5)*||41 (2.8)*,†,‡|
|Liraglutide 3 mg||0||0||7 (0.5)*,†||40 (2.7)*,†,‡|
|Naltrexone/bupropion||0||1 (0.1)||0||1 (0.1)|
Values are presented as mean± standard deviation or number (%).
BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; SGLT-2, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2; GLP-1 RA, glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonist; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/ kexin type 9.
Changes in metabolic syndrome components before (winter) and during (spring) the South Korea COVID-19 pandemic
|Variable||2016–2017 Change||2017–2018 Change||2018–2019 Change||2019–2020 Change|
|Weight (kg)||–0.07 ± 5.12||–0.89 ± 5.94*||–1.04 ± 7.75*||0.21 ± 3.05†,‡|
|BMI (kg/m2)||–0.02 ± 1.98||–0.34 ± 2.18*||–0.39 ± 3.03*||0.09 ± 1.16†,‡|
|SBP (mmHg )||–0.7 ± 14.3||–2.8 ± 14.3*||–1.4 ± 16.5||2.6 ± 18.2*,†,‡|
|DBP (mmHg )||–1.2 ± 10.5||–2.6 ± 9.6*||–1.7 ± 11.8||–0.4 ± 11.9†,‡|
|FPG (mg/dL)||–0.7 ± 36.8||–3.5 ± 37.4||–0.3 ± 41.6||–2.3 ± 36.2|
|HbA1c (%)||–0.04 ± 0.82||0.03 ± 0.79||0.05 ± 0.78*||0.07 ± 0.93*|
|TC (mg/dL)||–1.1 ± 25.9||–0.2 ± 30.4||–1.2 ± 29.4||4.1 ± 33.2*,†,‡|
|TG (mg/dL)||–7.1 ± 80.8||–7.1 ± 76.3||1.5 ± 72.6*,†||4.8 ± 69.4*,†|
|HDL-C (mg/dL)||–0.3 ± 6.9||–1.4 ± 6.7*||1.2 ± 7.4*,†||–0.6 ± 7.9†,‡|
|LDL-C (mg/dL)||–1.1 ± 18.7||7.4 ± 21.6*||–0.1 ± 20.9†||3.4 ± 24.1*,†,‡|
Values are presented as mean± standard deviation.
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.